|
詳細: Tospeed: 28元/月/512MBメモリ/15GBスペース/500GBトラフィック/KVM/ロサンゼルスセラ
夕方のピーク時でもパケットロスはなく、IOも良好、上司のサービス態度も良好です。 1. システム情報、帯域幅、I/Oテスト CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430 0 @ 2.20GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2194.710 MHz Total size of Disk : 38.0 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 2006 MB (93 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 2046 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 0 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-696.1.1.el6.x86_64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 99.2 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 87.1 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 104 MB/s Average I/O speed : 96.8 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 48.41 Mbit/s 91.71 Mbit/s 2.01 ms Chengdu CT 38.35 Mbit/s 37.74 Mbit/s 199.465 ms Xi'an CU 6.90 Mbit/s 51.73 Mbit/s 501.978 ms Shanghai CU 3.69 Mbit/s 60.68 Mbit/s 190.063 ms Chongqing CU 9.66 Mbit/s 56.64 Mbit/s 204.803 ms Xi'an CM 34.89 Mbit/s 73.66 Mbit/s 208.412 ms Shanghai CM 24.34 Mbit/s 62.16 Mbit/s 177.352 ms Chengdu CM 8.89 Mbit/s 2.62 Mbit/s 209.421 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 3 min 42 sec Current time : 2018-04-02 12:55:31 Finished！
2. アップロード/ダウンロード帯域幅テスト Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Speedtest.net (Los Angeles, CA) [0.70 km]: 1.622 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 91.94 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 48.85 Mbit/s
3. 国内アクセス速度
4. ハードディスクI/Oパフォーマンステスト dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 9.09875 s, 29.5 MB/s
5. Unixベンチ Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 02 2018 12:58:40 - 13:26:46 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23988455.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2608.2 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2649.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 651063.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 172915.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1381257.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1271393.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 248187.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8525.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4537.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1096.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1676480.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23988455.7 2055.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2608.2 474.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 2649.8 616.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 651063.0 1644.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 172915.3 1044.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1381257.8 2381.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1271393.0 1022.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 248187.7 620.5 Process Creation 126.0 8525.8 676.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4537.8 1070.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1096.4 1827.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1676480.8 1117.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1072.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 02 2018 13:26:46 - 13:54:55 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 52109530.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5736.2 MWIPS (9.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 7325.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 857000.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 229577.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2304731.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2696971.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 534603.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 21834.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8784.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1206.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2933768.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 52109530.6 4465.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5736.2 1043.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 7325.1 1703.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 857000.8 2164.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 229577.8 1387.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2304731.1 3973.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2696971.7 2168.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 534603.2 1336.5 Process Creation 126.0 21834.1 1732.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8784.7 2071.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1206.0 2010.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2933768.5 1955.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1990.6
6. パケットロステスト Ping from 192.168.43.94 to 23.225.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 04/02 20:58:26.354 Ping to 23.225.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/02 20:58:26.690 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=334ms TTL=48, ave=334.00ms 04/02 20:58:28.833 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=331ms TTL=48, ave=332.50ms 04/02 20:58:29.840 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=337ms TTL=48, ave=334.00ms 04/02 20:58:32.831 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=330ms TTL=48, ave=332.50ms 04/02 20:58:35.830 PingMin #9 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=322ms TTL=48, ave=331.33ms 04/02 20:58:37.837 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=339ms TTL=48, ave=331.55ms 04/02 20:58:39.840 PingMax #13 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=340ms TTL=48, ave=331.92ms 04/02 20:58:41.229 超時#14 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/02 20:58:42.843 PingMax #16 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=344ms TTL=48, ave=333.07ms 04/02 20:58:58.846 PingMax #32 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=345ms TTL=48, ave=334.52ms 04/02 20:59:10.228 超時#43 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/02 20:59:13.229 超時#46 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/02 20:59:22.856 PingMax #56 Reply 32 bytes from 23.225.xxx.xxx: time=353ms TTL=48, ave=334.85ms 04/02 20:59:45.229 超時#78 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/02 21:00:03.228 超時#96 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/02 21:00:06.830 === 100 有效發送, 95 接收, 5.00% 丟失, 335.03ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/04/02 20:58:26經過時間: 000:01:40結束時間: 2018/04/02 21:00:06 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送95 有效接收5 timed out (5.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值322ms, 最大值353ms, 平均值335.03ms
7. ルート追跡<br /> 通信
中国聯通
|
