WootHosting 2GB RAM ロサンゼルス KVM VPS レビュー

詳細: WootHosting: $18/年/メモリ 1GB/スペース 30GB/トラフィック 3TB/KVM/シカゴ/ニューヨーク/ロサンゼルス 評価によると、ネットワークとパフォーマンスの面ではシカゴが最高です。

1. システム情報、帯域幅、I/Oテスト

CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2399.998 MHz Total size of Disk : 48.0 GB (1.1 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 1893 MB (963 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 2047 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 2 hour 10 min Load average : 0.00, 0.56, 1.69 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : i686 (32 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.i686 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 188 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 129 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 114 MB/s Average I/O speed : 143.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 91.14 Mbit/s 96.99 Mbit/s 7.279 ms Xiangyang CT 16.37 Mbit/s 23.67 Mbit/s 552.282 ms Chengdu CT 11.01 Mbit/s 31.86 Mbit/s 225.871 ms Xi'an CU 10.40 Mbit/s 23.33 Mbit/s 310.033 ms Shanghai CU 8.64 Mbit/s 29.57 Mbit/s 186.152 ms Chongqing CU 11.59 Mbit/s 22.65 Mbit/s 295.96 ms Xi'an CM 33.20 Mbit/s 34.62 Mbit/s 222.813 ms Shanghai CM 12.50 Mbit/s 10.38 Mbit/s 244.821 ms Chengdu CM 14.13 Mbit/s 4.46 Mbit/s 214.583 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 19 sec Current time : 2018-04-25 08:06:25 Finished！

2. アップロード/ダウンロード帯域幅テスト

Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Atlantic Metro (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 2.655 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 87.01 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 78.62 Mbit/s

3. 国内アクセス速度

4. ハードディスクI/Oパフォーマンステスト

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 12.1633 s, 22.1 MB/s

5. Unixベンチ

Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 25 2018 06:53:12 - 07:21:09 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10518541.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2257.1 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 541.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 127384.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 32356.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 389937.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 207973.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 58187.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 1020.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1691.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 404.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1373162.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10518541.4 901.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2257.1 410.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 541.5 125.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 127384.6 321.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 32356.3 195.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 389937.7 672.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 207973.8 167.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 58187.2 145.5 Process Creation 126.0 1020.8 81.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1691.1 398.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 404.7 674.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1373162.6 915.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 315.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 25 2018 07:21:09 - 07:49:23 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18523371.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4236.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2125.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 183407.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 47587.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 630940.5 KBps (31.3 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 353052.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 108782.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6157.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3336.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 478.8 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2010680.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18523371.4 1587.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4236.8 770.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 2125.4 494.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 183407.9 463.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 47587.1 287.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 630940.5 1087.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 353052.6 283.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 108782.5 272.0 Process Creation 126.0 6157.1 488.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3336.0 786.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 478.8 798.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2010680.5 1340.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 612.3

6. パケットロステスト

Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 107.150.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 04/25 20:34:56.906 Ping to 107.150.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/25 20:34:57.152 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=244ms TTL=52, ave=244.00ms 04/25 20:34:58.181 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=279ms TTL=52, ave=261.50ms 04/25 20:34:59.151 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=242ms TTL=52, ave=255.00ms 04/25 20:35:00.141 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=238ms TTL=52, ave=250.75ms 04/25 20:35:01.187 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=284ms TTL=52, ave=257.40ms 04/25 20:35:02.139 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=233ms TTL=52, ave=253.33ms 04/25 20:35:04.418 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=514ms TTL=52, ave=283.63ms 04/25 20:35:06.462 超時#10 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/25 20:35:26.461 超時#30 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/25 20:35:40.461 超時#44 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/25 20:35:46.116 PingMin #50 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=214ms TTL=52, ave=266.23ms 04/25 20:35:47.096 PingMin #51 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=194ms TTL=52, ave=264.73ms 04/25 20:35:51.093 PingMin #55 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=191ms TTL=52, ave=260.13ms 04/25 20:35:52.091 PingMin #56 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=189ms TTL=52, ave=258.79ms 04/25 20:35:53.087 PingMin #57 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=186ms TTL=52, ave=257.44ms 04/25 20:35:56.462 超時#60 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/25 20:35:59.088 PingMin #63 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=185ms TTL=52, ave=255.25ms 04/25 20:36:23.085 PingMin #87 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=184ms TTL=52, ave=241.72ms 04/25 20:36:36.096 === 100 有效發送, 96 接收, 4.00% 丟失, 236.48ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/04/25 20:34:56經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/04/25 20:36:36 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送96 有效接收4 timed out (4.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值184ms, 最大值514ms, 平均值236.48ms

7. ルート追跡<br /> 通信

中国聯通

8. YouTube スピードテスト