詳細: BandwidthServer: $15/年/512MB メモリ/15GB スペース/2TB トラフィック/KVM/ロサンゼルス QN 今のところ、かなり良さそうです。他のいくつかの低価格 KVM VPS と比較すると、価格は比較的高いため、パフォーマンス、ネットワークなどがより保証されます。 1. システム情報、帯域幅、I/Oテスト CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2400.084 MHz Total size of Disk : 29.5 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 996 MB (32 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 22 hour 58 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.9.0-4-amd64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 214 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 376 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 265 MB/s Average I/O speed : 285.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 106.64 Mbit/s 108.62 Mbit/s 2.205 ms Xiangyang CT 21.98 Mbit/s 74.57 Mbit/s 281.009 ms Chengdu CT 29.03 Mbit/s 67.95 Mbit/s 197.661 ms Xi'an CU 42.45 Mbit/s 56.59 Mbit/s 269.401 ms Shanghai CU 25.10 Mbit/s 4.90 Mbit/s 173.4 ms Chongqing CU 29.17 Mbit/s 31.57 Mbit/s 247.451 ms Xi'an CM 65.35 Mbit/s 73.87 Mbit/s 224.008 ms Shanghai CM 8.10 Mbit/s 17.52 Mbit/s 185.757 ms Chengdu CM 19.98 Mbit/s 44.45 Mbit/s 212.144 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 3 min 43 sec Current time : 2018-04-28 00:47:23 Finished!
2. アップロード/ダウンロード帯域幅テスト Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by SingTel (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 5.616 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 108.81 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 70.30 Mbit/s
3. 国内アクセス速度
4. ハードディスクI/Oパフォーマンステスト dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB, 256 MiB) copied, 4.30192 s, 62.4 MB/s
5. Unixベンチ Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 28 2018 01:02:28 - 01:32:01 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16988505.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3088.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2394.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 503331.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 240921.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1687289.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1745218.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 232468.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 9850.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7256.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 966.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2699702.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16988505.8 1455.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3088.3 561.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 2394.6 556.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 503331.5 1271.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 240921.0 1455.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1687289.6 2909.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1745218.4 1402.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 232468.4 581.2 Process Creation 126.0 9850.0 781.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7256.2 1711.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 966.4 1610.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2699702.0 1799.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1186.0
6. パケットロステスト Ping from 10.0.0.16 to 216.45.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 04/28 12:53:07.648 Ping to 216.45.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/28 12:53:07.921 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=271ms TTL=52, ave=271.00ms 04/28 12:53:08.910 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=259ms TTL=52, ave=265.00ms 04/28 12:53:09.936 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=283ms TTL=52, ave=271.00ms 04/28 12:53:12.907 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=256ms TTL=52, ave=268.50ms 04/28 12:53:13.901 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=251ms TTL=52, ave=266.00ms 04/28 12:53:18.881 PingMin #12 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=230ms TTL=52, ave=264.50ms 04/28 12:53:19.858 PingMin #13 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=208ms TTL=52, ave=260.15ms 04/28 12:53:20.857 PingMin #14 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=206ms TTL=52, ave=256.29ms 04/28 12:53:33.941 PingMax #27 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=291ms TTL=52, ave=254.59ms 04/28 12:53:50.027 PingMax #43 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=374ms TTL=52, ave=263.14ms 04/28 12:53:52.090 PingMax #45 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=439ms TTL=52, ave=267.62ms 04/28 12:54:26.179 超時#79 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 04/28 12:54:46.938 === 100 有效發送, 99 接收, 1.00% 丟失, 266.71ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/04/28 12:53:07經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/04/28 12:54:46 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送99 有效接收1 timed out (1.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值206ms, 最大值439ms, 平均值266.71ms
7. 出発ルートの追跡<br /> 通信
中国聯通
8. YouTube スピードテスト
|